| Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, Part 2 |
|
|
|
| Written by Casey Robbins | |
|
Peter Moskos wrote in an article, “"Law or no law, standards of professional conduct demand that military personnel avoid asking about, talking about or flaunting sexual orientation." Yes, yes, I already know the argument’s coming: ‘But a straight military man can have his wife drop him off at work and kiss him goodbye. A gay man couldn’t have his partner drop him off and kiss him goodbye or hold his hand in public without it being perceived as unprofessional just because he’s gay.’
Well actually, if you want to get really technical then here goes. According to the military traditions and regulations public displays of affection are prohibited while in uniform and/or while on duty. Period. The rule applies to homosexuals and heterosexuals alike.
Oh and the latest one from the Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, Ike Skelton, “What do mommies and daddies say to their seven year old child?”, afraid to open up a national discussion about homosexuality. Mr. Skelton, what would a mommy and daddy tell their seven year old child who saw two men kissing each other in public? It exists. Let’s talk about it, get over it and move on with life. Let’s just please not let it be the main topic regarding our national policy decisions. Mr. Skelton, how are you doing with the sexual assault prevention in the military? What about the jobless and homeless rate among veterans? Glad you care so much, Mr. Skelton.
Democrats will try to make it a big matter even in the midst of a sky-high unemployment rate, a still down-turned economy, a major ecological disaster and a slew of other issues that need solving yesterday. And the sad thing is, the Republicans will buy right into it and fight it, knowing that it will solidify their conservative base. It couldn’t have come at a better time than campaign season for reelection in Washington. Mr. President, how is that unemployment rate coming along? Have we figured out how to stop the oil from leaking into the ocean and destroying all its life or are we just going to let it all drain out and then deal with it afterwards?
Read part one of this article.
Casey Robbins was born and raised in Idaho. He is a veteran of the U.S. Army and Iraq War, and currently resides in Atlanta, GA with his son.
Bookmark
Email This
Comments (4)
![]()
PLJ: ... http://www.prissymag.com
Thanks for giving us an insider's perspective, Casey!
1
August 16, 2010
Laura Enem: ...
Well I concur on most of what you said.. It's a no brainer. I mean for person to really care so much about another's preference says more about that person then the individual in question. It's a waste of time.. I agree with most of your points but when you went on a tangent with the "blame game" of repubs vs democrats then that kinda threw me for a loop...I mean seriously, are we forgetting that the problems we have today are the same problems that began in the fall of 2007? I call a spade a spade and at the end of the day these problems originated under a different administration. I remember watching all of these businesses fall and crumble which is the very reason that MCcain lost the election. People got scared and the word republican became a "disease" or a soiled word..It is what it is...That drove people to cross over to the dems side in droves...so I'm not falling for the okey doke lol... I will never forget when I walked past a Mervyn's and a Circuit City and they were closed and out of business..what about when we all sat back and watched on our TV sets all of the businesses on wallstreet that went under and DHL, a well known business, if I'm not mistaken went under too or one of those well known couriers..... I was like "wow, what is happening to America?" And guess when this took place? yep, 2008!!! Obama was not even a front runner at that time....okay so I'm done...lol... I will be awaiting your reprisal ha ha ha.
3
August 17, 2010
Casey Robbins: ... http://www.createspace.com/3477328
@ Michael: Thank you ;)
@ Laura: I wasn't trying to play any blame game except to blame politicians for being... well, politicians. The policy is fine. The point I was trying to make was this: the only reason it's even being discussed right now is because it's election year and election season. Everybody knows that in order to win an election, you have to secure the base of support for your given party. Republicans can't win without the conservative vote and Democrats can't win without the liberal vote. And so now they're both playing into the game of politics as usual and making this non-issue an issue for the sake of securing their base of support among their voters. It's that simple. The only blame game I was playing is blaming politicians for being, well, politicians. They're both equally to blame for pushing this issue that shouldn't even be a concern in light of the current state of the union. Now with that being said, the only reason I mentioned Clinton is to remind liberals of the hypocrisy for wanting this policy repealed since it was, after all, originating from a liberal administration. I also mentioned Ike Skelton (a Republican) because he's blowing the issue out of proportion and making it about something it's not. And his comments about bringing up a national discussion on homosexuality amongst our children was ridiculous. He could have come up with a better excuse to oppose the left's attempts to repeal DADT. Furthermore, as the Chairman of the Armed Services Committee, he should be MUCH more concerned with issues that our servicemembers face... like the issues of them risking their lives everyday in service of their country, the sexual assault issue in the military that has been swept under the rug in lieu of discussing the DADT policy, and many many more issues. I'm not blaming Obama for how the economy got to be the way that it was, I'm blaming him for getting involved in this debate when he, as President of the United States should be concerned with issues, that at the present are much more pressing and deserve his attention (like how to get out of this downturned economy) more than DADT. Sorry if it seemed like I was going off on a tangent, but I assure you it was all a apart of my point which was summed up in the last paragraph of the article which basically said: s**t or get of the pot, but quit wasting our time, money, energy and resources on deciding the morality of you taking a s**t while you should be squeezing it out and being done with it. 4
August 20, 2010
Write comment
|










Peter Moskos wrote in an article, “"Law or no law, standards of professional conduct demand that military personnel avoid asking about, talking about or flaunting sexual orientation." Yes, yes, I already know the argument’s coming: ‘But a straight military man can have his wife drop him off at work and kiss him goodbye. A gay man couldn’t have his partner drop him off and kiss him goodbye or hold his hand in public without it being perceived as unprofessional just because he’s gay.’









